Ugliness
| In "Kant's Problems with
Ugliness," the author argues that Kant's
attempt in the third Critique to overcome
the gulf between the realms of nature and
freedom, by showing that the natural or
phenomenal world is receptive to the
efficacy of pure practical reason, is
incompatible with the existence of
ugliness…This argument, I suggest, rests
on a failure to recognize Kant's
distinction between aesthetic and
teleological reflective judgment, and
evinces a misunderstanding of the complex
and delicate relationship which Kant
constructs on the one hand and morality on
the other. (The Journal of Aesthetics
and Art Criticism 50:4 Fall 1992) |
I couldn't agree
more. Or maybe I couldn't disagree more. (I got lost
at "teleological reflective judgment.") Anyway, it got
me thinking about "ugly." I didn't grow up with that
concept. There were a lot of positive words, such as good looking, beautiful, handsome, etc.
Negatives included plain,
but we never called people ugly. Negative adjectives usually
referred to personality rather than physical
appearance. Thus, a handsome guy could still be a jerk. I wasn't
truly made aware of ugly
as a simple descriptor until I moved to Naples.
A short time after I barreled my lock and stock into
a rather large Neapolitan extended family, I ran into
one of my extensions on the cable car. I knew he was a
relative because I had met him at a family outing, but
I really had no idea exactly who he was. Keeping track of
my in-laws is an exercise in kinship anthropology of
Dostoevskian proportions. (You will recall that
Sergei's second cousin's niece's sister, Anna, whose
grandmother's stepbrother, Maxim, is really the
bastard son of Lt. Kasov's uncle, has been using her
maiden name ever since page 445, just to keep you on
your toes.) Anyway, (you can get off your toes, now—or
at least get off mine) he (my relative, not
Dostoevsky—c'mon, pay attention!) recognized me and
called me by name, but I couldn't place him. When I
reported the incident to my wife, she asked: "Who was
it?"
"I don't know."
"Well, what did he look like?"
"Hair, arms, legs, the usual things. Nice little guy.
Getting along in years. Very amiable."
"Was he ugly?"
Was he ugly?!
Now,
that was the first time in my life that I had ever
heard that question! Forget Caucasian male, medium
build, receding hairline, aquiline nose, high
cheekbones, lantern-jawed, almond-eyed,
brachycephalic, identifying marks, scars or tattoos.
Why, yes, officer, I can describe the suspect exactly:
he was ugly!
How ugly was he? Well, I'll tellya! Why, he was so
ugly …(wake up the drummer for some rim-shots!)
…we didn't know if that was his face or whether his
neck simply had a bad case of acne! (ka-bam!)
Why, his mother used to put a sack over her own head
when she breast-fed him! (ba-boom!) She tried putting
one over his head once, too, but she got arrested for
bag abuse! (ba-da-boom!) Why, he was so ugly, he
looked in a mirror once and he broke!
(Forget it. Tell the drummer to go back to
sleep.)
"Huh?" I answered. "I don't know."
"What do you mean, you don't know. Either someone is
ugly or he's not!"
When my wife found out from the family grapevine (a
Beaujolais-sized vineyard, really) who I was talking
about, she couldn't believe it.
"How can you possibly say he's not ugly?! He's the
ugliest one in the whole family!"
"But…," I sputtered, "…you just can't say that about
someone!"
"Why not? It's not his fault, just like it's not
someone else's merit to be good-looking. God got
distracted and let the clay sit too long, that's all."
I was relieved to know that when you're working with
hydrous aluminum silicates, even He is not
perfect.
Indeed, in Naples, as in much of the world, "ugly" is no
big deal. Leonardo did some of his most marvelous
sketches of ugly persons (insert in the photo, above).
Ghandi was ugly. Mother Theresa was ugly. Gorillas are
ugly—big lovable cuddly creatures who would share their
last banana with you. But they're ugly. And so
what.
to: main
index to: portal index for
traditions, customs, etc.