Murat, Gioacchino (1767-1815)
Statue
of
Murat
along the facade of the Royal Palace.
The
shortest-lived dynasty to rule the Kingdom of Naples
in its long history was the one installed by Napoleon
Bonaparte in 1806. It was the second time in less than
a decade that the French had "liberated" Naples from
the Bourbons. Earlier, in
1799, the forces of the revolutionary French Republic
had set up and shored up the Pathenopean
Republic in Naples; however, this sister
republic to the south lasted a mere six months before
the Bourbon rulers returned from Sicilian exile to
restore their monarchy.
In 1806, however, France was firmly in the hands of
Napoleon, who, this time around, was taking no chances.
He chased the King and Queen of Naples back to Sicily
and installed his own brother, Joseph, as King of
Naples. Two years later he moved Joseph over to the
throne of Spain and installed as King of Naples his
sister Carolina's husband, Joachim (Gioacchino, in
Italian) Murat, a trusted military aide. Murat already
had a reputation as a daring cavalry leader, having
distinguished himself in support of the French Republic
and, later, Napoleon's meteoric rise to power. Murat's
role in the Egyptian campaign (1798-99) and then in the
battles of Austerliz and Jena was heroic. His rule in
Naples would last until 1815 and would produce sweeping
political and social changes way out of proportion to
the few brief years involved.
The changes that took place in Naples under Murat more
or less paralleled the changes in the rest of Europe
brought about through the imposition of the so-called
"Napoleonic Code," a legal system as monumental in human
history as the codes of Hammurabi and Justinian, or the
Magna Carta. In the Kingdom of Naples, the Napoleonic
Code dismantled the 1000-year-old social structure of
feudalism. It also instituted a civil service based on
merit, one through which even modest citizens of the
kingdom could advance. Those two items mark the
beginning of an economic middle class—truly the end of
one age and the beginning of another. (It is important
to remember that in spite of Napoleon's ultimate defeat,
these changes helped shape subsequent European
history.)
Murat also revamped the former Bourbon military
academy, the Nunziatella, so as to make the
military less alienated from the people. He encouraged
citizens to avail themselves of military careers and
rise through the ranks. He, the king, himself, was the
prime example, having started life as the son of an
inn-keeper. University reform and the beginnings of
scientific facilities such as the observatory and the
Botanical Gardens are all part of the innovations in
Naples under Murat. Physically, the city acquired broad
new roads such as via Posillipo and the
boulevard leading from the National
Museum out to Capodimonte. (The original name of
that splendid thoroughfare was, fittingly, Corso
Napoleone.) Additionally, the mammoth structure in
what is now Piazza Plebiscito, the Church of San Francesco di
Paola, was begun under Murat. It was planned to be
but the beginning of an enormous civic center, a
forum.
What most fascinates about Murat, however, is not the
social change he wrought in Naples, substantial though
that may be. It was his political ambition. At the
beginning of the nineteenth century the main actors in
what is termed the Risorgimento—the movement to
unify Italy—Mazzini, Cavour, Garibaldi,
were still a generation in the future. The first
rumblings of the Risorgimento were already being heard,
however. The famous patriotic phrase of Italian patriots
in the 19th century, "We shall not be free until we
are one," was borrowed from Vincenzo
Cuoco, a Neapolitan writer and social philosopher
very active during Murat's reign. Additionally, secret
societies such as the Carbonari
first took hold in Italy in the south at the time of
Murat; their avowed aim was constitutional government
and eventual unification of Italy. Interestingly, Murat
encouraged these groups, for he apparently saw himself
as the fulfillment of their vision—he would be the
unifier and King of Italy!
As grandiose as such ambitions were, they were piddling
next to those of his brother-in-law's, who was worried
about continents and not mere nations. Thus, Murat found
himself back at Napoleon's side, serving as valiantly as
ever in the Russian campaign of 1812. In the face of
Napoleon's setbacks, however, Murat grew concerned about
his own Kingdom of Naples and returned in early 1813.
The "Neapolitan War"
This little-used term refers to Murat's activities after
Napoleon's exile to Elba in May of 1814. With the
Emperor defeated, Murat figured that he, the ruler of a
French client-state, would not be far behind. Indeed,
there was already talk of restoring the Bourbons to the
throne of Naples. Murat thus signed a treaty with
Austria, the terms of which stipulated that his
Neapolitan army would help Austria against the remnants
of Napoleon's Italy, namely the French "vice-realm of
Italy," much of the northern peninsular, ruled by Prince
Eugène, Napoleon's step-son. Murat did that. He
moved north, taking over the Papal States and Tuscany,
unifying a large portion of the peninsula on his own. In
return for that, the treaty with Austria assured that he
would remain on the throne of Naples. It seems to most
historians that Murat was intent on much more than that,
however. He would unite the peninsula and, as noted
above, indeed be the first king of a united Italy.
We'll never know that might have turned out since in the
midst of all this, the Emperor escaped from Elba and set
out for Paris for his famous "100 Days," his last gasp
before ultimate defeat at Waterloo. Murat now decided to
realign himself with his brother-in-law and to wage war
against the Austrians. Those battles fought by Murat's
army during the 100 Days are the "Neapolitan War" and
had the dual purpose of saving his own throne in Naples
and also of keeping the Austrians from moving west into
France to take on Napoleon. He lost a major battle at
Tolentino in early May. His army was in tatters. He
returned to Naples and then fled the kingdom.
With Austrian troops now advancing on the city of
Naples, Murat issued his last proclamation to the people
of the Kingdom of Naples appears in the Giornale delle Due Sicilie
(Journal of the Two Sicilies) on May 18, 1815. He writes
from San Leucio, near Caserta. He warns against fear
mongers and says, "The enemy is still distant...but I
shall never expose you to the terrors of warfare within
our capital [the city of Naples]." Then, in what amounts
to a farewell, says, "If destiny must strike, let it
strike only me." With that, he was gone. The newspaper
appears a few days later on May 23, 1815. The lead
article is a proclamation from Ferdinand IV, welcoming
himself back to his kingdom and promising love and
benevolence. It is written from Palermo, Sicily,
where he had weathered, for the second time in 10 years,
the storm of exile. He assumed the title of Ferdinand I,
King of the Two Sicilies (as opposed to Ferdinand IV,
King of Naples). His wife, Queen Caroline, had died in
Austria in 1814. Ferdinand married again. He died in
1825, having ruled Naples—with a few interruptions—
since 1759.
In retrospect, the Neapolitan War produced one startling
document. On March 1815, Murat issued the Rimini
proclamation. It starts:
"Italians! The hour
has come to engage in your highest destiny. Providence
has called you to be an independent nation. From the
Alps to the straits of Sicily, there is but one
cry—"Italian independence!..."
Although there had been philosophical musing along those
lines for some time, this is the first political
proclamation of its kind calling for all Italians to
unite into a single people and drive out the foreigners.
It is seen as somewhat of the opening statement of the risorgimento.
Manzoni, himself, the philosopher of Italian unity is
said to have drawn inspiration from it.
After fleeing the kingdom, Murat went to Paris where
Napoleon refused to see him. Then, after Waterloo,
Murat's fate was sealed. His kingdom was back in the
hands of the Bourbons and there was nothing he could do
about it. Yet, he still wasn't through. This quixotic
would–be king of a united Italy refused benevolent
offers to be put out to pasture and live out his days in
peace. Instead, he took a handful of men and landed at
Pizzo on the coast of Calabria, no doubt imagining
himself rallying the local military forces and then
marching north to retake his kingdom. Instead, he was
imprisoned and sentenced to death. His appeals to
Ferdinand, the restored King of Naples, that you just
didn't shoot fellow kings, fell on deaf ears.
On October 18, 1815, Gioacchino Murat, in a last
typical display of bravado, refused the blindfold and
commanded his own execution. A second-hand account of
the episode is found in the The Nooks and By-Ways of
Italy by Craufurd Tait Ramage, which went through
a single edition in 1868.
[ Click here to read
an excerpt from that source.]
[A
second account of the episode is from The North
American Review, May 1816. Click here.]
Also, in a highly
laudatory biography of Murat, the American Whig Review
of June, 1845, had this to say about him:
“…He
had fought two hundred battles, and exposed himself to
death more frequently than any other officer in
Napoleon’s army. By his white plume and gorgeous
costume a constant mark for the enemy’s bullets, he
notwithstanding always plunged into the thickest
dangers, and it seems almost a miracle that he
escaped death. His self-composure was wonderful,
especially when we remember what a creature of impulse
he was. In the most appalling dangers, under the fire
of the most terrific battery, all alone amid his
dead followers, while the bullets were piercing
his uniform and whistling in an incessant shower
around his head, he would sit on his steed and eye
every discharge with the coolness of an iron statue. A
lofty feeling in the hour of danger bore him above all
fear, and through clouds of smoke and the roar of five
hundred cannon, he would detect at a glance the weak
point of the enemy, and charge like fire upon it.
“As a general he failed frequently, as has been
remarked, from yielding his judgment to his impulses.
As a man and king he did the same thing, and hence was
generous to a fault, and liberal and indulgent to his
people. But his want of education in early life
rendered him unfit for a statesman. Yet his impulses,
had they been less strong, would not have made him the
officer he was. His cavalry was the terror of Europe.
Besides, in obeying his generous feelings, he
performed many of those deeds of heroism—exposing his
life for others, and sacrificing everything he had, to
render those happy around him, which make us love his
character. He was romantic even till his death, and
lived in an atmosphere of his own creation.”
A statue of Murat was erected in the
1880s as one of the eight
that line the west facade of the Royal
Palace in Naples.
to main index
to history portal
|