|
Algonquins, Seals, Vesuvius & William Marlow
First, the painting is by the English painter, William Marlow (1740-1813). He was a popular and respected landscape artist who specialized in subjects taken from the so-called Grand Tour, among which were a number of paintings of Italy, particularly scenery and ruins that would appeal to the Grand Tourists of his day. Vesuvius erupting certainly fits in that category. The painting is from 1768; there were two verifiably large eruptions of Vesuvius in the 1700s—1737 and 1794—so there may be some poetic license in the fireworks, but that’s fine. That’s what artists do; people are more likely to buy a painting of a volcano erupting than not erupting. Marlow retired in the 1780s, but financial difficulties prompted him to publish Etched Views in Italy in 1795, a collection of six etchings he made from his own earlier water-colors and oils. His work includes a number of scenes in Naples besides the one of Vesuvius shown here. So far, so
good. Now—the biography of Marlow in the
authoritative Grove
Art Online also contains this: “He is
also thought to have designed the seals for the
original 13 United States of America.”
That’s all it says. No source, no
citation. We warn
college students against “they say” statements
like that without backing them up. That is, if I
read that Mozart wrote Dixie, I want some
proof. On the surface, the Grove sentence means
that—besides the Alonguin gentleman
mentioned—there were 12 other seals that Marlow
purportedly had something to do with. The
possibilities are, if not endless, at least
many: ships, plows, sheaves of wheat, olive
branches and eagles—and that's just
Pennsylvania. You can do the rest, yourselves,
but there
are published accounts of how most of these
emblems were designed or chosen, and none of
them mention the English painter. So, doesn’t
this sound like one of those bits of vandalism
that college-kids with too much time sneak into
Wikipedia articles? Except that this is Grove. The Grove, as they say. I have
written a pompous letter to the editors and am
awaiting a reply. I’ll let you know. I really want it to be true. [update: some weeks later] I am vindicated but disappointed. A very nice
lady, Jane, an editor at Grove agreed with me and
said they would delete that passage in time for
the next on-line edition of the Grove Art Online.
Sigh. Too bad. What a story. [update: April, 2011] This precise and interesting clarification comes to me very kindly from Professor Michael Liversidge, Emeritus Dean, Faculty of Arts, University of Bristol:
to main index to literature portal |