|
These items appeared separately in the Around Naples Encyclopedia on the dates indicated. They have been consolidated onto a single page here. 1. entry May 2003
installation art;
Anish Kapoor
Neapolitans are most familiar with Kapoor from his gigantic site sculpture, Taratantara, originally created for the new Gateshead's Baltic Centre for Contemporary Arts in England in 1999, but then set up in Piazza Plebiscito (photo) in Naples in December of 2000 as that year's contribution to the annual exposition of installation art of one sort or another. The title is meant to be echoic of the sound made by a trumpet fanfare, as in Roman poet Quintus Ennius' line, "At tuba terribili sonitu taratantara dixit" — ("But the trumpet sounded with its terrible taratantara", the onomatopoeia usually left untranslated). Indeed, the sculpture suggests two funnel-like trumpet bells joined and flaring out to both ends, something like those strange geometric figures that scientists use to describe what sort of transdimensional hyperspace thing (a technical term) we shall have to traverse if we ever hope to reach the stars. Taratantara was made of a shiny red membrane, glittered in the sun, was about 50 meters long, 20 high and anchored in Piazza Plebiscito by steel columns at each end. While it was up, the columns were scaled by demonstrators. They weren't out to damage the sculpture—and didn't—but the offices of the Naples Prefecture bounds the north side of the square and that's always a good place to have a demonstration. I am reminded of a clipping I read once in the
paper: An English art student's work was thrown out, literally, after an official at a Birmingham art center mistook it for trash from the opening day party. Ceri Davie's "Piece de Resistance" involved red jellies displayed on plates and was intended as a metaphor of decay. ‘Months of hard work had just gone to waste,’ the artist said. "I was quite horrified. Very few of us realize the tough row that artists have to hoe in dealing with Philistines such as that art center official. This is probably because practical hoes weren’t even invented until the Middle Ages. As far as we know, the Philistines just got down on all fours and grubbed their rows into shape with their hands. Many years before the Decadent Red Jelly affair referred to above, one of the artist’s earlier works, Empty Paper Picnic Plate—which consisted of an empty paper picnic plate— was not all well received by critics, who found the title too hard to say five times real fast and who also mistook "empty paper" as a metaphor of life instead of a Minimalist description of paper picnics, the plate itself being just a secondary, but sardonic, appliquè —which is just as well, since it too was given the old heave-ho. Fortunately (maybe), it was saved, since the art center official who tossed it, threw it into what he thought was a trash bin, but which, in fact, was also past of the art show. And then there was the artist’s Hamburger, those little pointillist nibbles of semi-conceptualist cholesterol-laden ground Bœuf, a yummy but still youthful version of her later, futuristic, Quarter-Pounder With Cheese, in which patrons of the art show were required to flip burgers in the kitchen, then ask themselves in the drive-through microphone if they “would like fries with that?” and then—ah, the stochastic power of it all!—eat or not eat the work of art! How was the artist to know that they had scheduled the exhibit in the same hall as a dog show? It was to her credit as a resourceful master of Performance Art that she retitled the whole thing, Gone to the Dogs, A Metaphor. (Or Maybe It’s a Simile). Davies is not the only artist who has had this trouble. Fortunately, I am in the possession of a section of the diary of Michelangelo (the National Library knows nothing about this): January 8, 1504. Dear diary. I’m ruined. After years of work in chipping away the pieces, I have finally figured out where beauty is, and it’s not in chubby women with smiling faces. I busted my hump on this one, too! (Alas, even in a society where males with humps are considered good omens, there is not much use for a sculptor with a busted one, I’m afraid.)I'll see your metafour and raise you five. 2. entry Dec. 2002
installation art;
memento mori; "skulls"
The large and spacious square between the main façade of the Royal Palace and the Church of San Francesco di Paola is Piazza del Plebiscito. It is ideally suited for outdoor concerts, street musicians, jugglers, and large groups of tourists to shuffle nervously as they are efficiently herded from statue to statue by stray dogs. The square also lends itself to modern sculpture of the
kind that art critics call "installation art" and the
rest of us rustic dullards call, "What in the world is
that supposed to be?!" Generally speaking,
installation art requires
some—well,installation—something in the way of mounting,
draping, hanging, digging or soldering. The displays,
themselves, may include ("...but are not limited to...,"
as lawyers so craftily hedge) metal, wood, plastic,
rubber, and assorted minerals, fabrics and liquids.
The work consisted of a number of bronze skulls implanted in the pavement (photo). The work, thus, is Horn's tribute to—or variation on—the well-known Neapolitan "cult of death" (so-called by some) that centers on the vast collection of human skulls on the premises of the Fontanelle cemetery in Naples. The work is "site specific," a sub-genre of installation art, in that it makes sense only within the context of the place where it is exhibited—in this case, Naples. The Fontanelle cemetery
is carved out of the tufaceous hillside in the Materdei
section of Naples. The vast chambers on the premises
served for centuries as a charnel house for paupers. At
the end of the 19th century, Father Gaetano Barbati had
the chaotically buried skeletal remains disinterred and
cataloged. They then remained on the surface, stored in
makeshift crypts, in boxes and on wooden racks. From
that moment, a spontaneous cult of affection for, and
devotion to, the remains of these unnamed dead developed
in Naples. Defenders of the cult pointed out that they
were paying respect to those who had had none in life,
who had been too poor even to have a proper burial.
Though the practice has largely disappeared, devotees
used to pay visits to the skulls, clean them—"adopt"
them, in a way, even giving the skulls back their
"living" names (revealed to the caretakers in dreams).
Yes, all that. In
the
church
of Purgatorio dell'Arco At the church of Sant'Agostino alla Zecca
3. entry Jan. 2004
Installation Art '04 This year's
ritual installation of art in Piazza Plebiscito features a
work entitled "Naples," by the master of massive
minimalism, San Francisco artist Richard Serra (1939-). It
is a large spiral (already called "Contraception of the
Gods" by those who view with some disdain the city's
unabashed dedication to this kind of display). Entering
into the giant orange sculpture of curved and bending
steel plates, you spiral in, leaning in and out with the
curves of the walls, to the center, where you can look up
and see the clock tower on the facade of the royal palace
(see photo and insert). The individual's perception as he
navigates the deceptive geometry of this small, tilted
space set in the larger space of the square, itself, is
what gives validity to the work, says the artist. Clearly,
to be a private experience—to be at all touched by the
suggested metaphor of yourself in a similarly skewed
private life-space set in the space of the world at
large—the wandering in and out is best done slowly and
alone and not as part of a curious herd elbowing their way
in and out—unless, of course, you spend much of your time
elbowing your way through life wondering what it's all
about. That, too, is possible.The work bears an amazing resemblance to Serra's earlier "Torqued Ellipses," done in 1996, separate curved plates of towering steel, which, to the untrained maximalist eye—with a bit of imagination—might be fit together into a spiral. 4. entry Jan
2005
Installation Art 2004/5 It has been ten
years since the city of Naples started adorning the vast
Piazza Plebiscito with examples of "Installation
Art"—exhibits of various kinds put in place in December
and then taken down after the holiday season. Some of
these works have evoked bewilderment in the eye of the
beholder. Or hostility. Or admiration. That of, course, is
what such art is meant to do: spin a web of extended
discourse around itself, made up of people's reactions,
which themselves become part of the answer to that nagging
question: "What in the world is that supposed to
be?" Such works in the last decade in Naples have
included Mimmo Paladino's "Salt Mountain," Anish Kapoor's
"Taratantara" (#1, above), and Rebecca Horn's exhibit of
bronze skulls, "Spirits of Mother of Pearl," embedded in
the pavement itself (#2, above).This year's work is Luciano Fabro's "Italia all'asta" (photo, left). Asta means auction in Italian; thus, "Italy for sale" or "Italy to the highest bidder" captures the spirit of the title. It is a 30-meter tower wrapped round by a convoluted map of the "Two Italies"—North and South—one part of which is inverted. The halves touch and, thus, are joined. The sculpture is marked in places with the names of various sections of the nation that have been sold off for one reason or another during the centuries—Nice and Savoy, for example, ceded to the French in 1859 in return for French help in the Italian wars of independence against Austria. The tower is also marked by the names of private corporations that have been allowed to buy "what belongs to the Italian people" (to cite the explanatory notes given out at Piazza Plebiscito); that is, fundamental resources in the areas of communication, energy, and the chemical and automobile industries, most of which have now been "privatised". The exhibit does not bill itself as a protest, but it doesn't have to. Anyone who has been keeping up with recent government attempts to sell off historical monuments in Italy will understand what the exhibit is all about. ("Welcome to Rome. See the Nike Colosseum!" Am I kidding? So far, yes.) First of all, the division of the gigantic representation of Italy into two—the Two Italies—recalls that split in the national psyche, something that might not occur to foreigners, but which is ever-present in the minds of all Italians, even a century and a half after unification. Second, in spite of the metal construction, the tower is probably best called by the religious or Baroque term, "spire," since it is set up in the middle of a large square, recalls two other large, permanent spires in Naples (at Piazza del Gesù Nuovo and Piazza San Domenico Maggiore), and is, in fact, a tribute to the importance of the piazza in Italian history—the public gathering place, where people talked, danced, bought and sold, where revolutions started, proclamations were read and even executions carried out. "The city is born from the square, not vice versa," says Fabro, in an original poem that accompanies the explanatory notes. It is the perfect site in Naples to generate questions about the modern identity of Italians, a people that are among the great bearers of European culture over the centuries. The exhibit has some interesting sidelights. One is the presence of various mathematical and musical symbols affixed to the colonnade of the church of San Francesco di Paola, the building on the west side of the giant square. (These are, I suppose, tributes to the Greek origins of Naples and Italian scientists and musicians of the past. It also reminds me that one year, the entire exhibit consisted of a single Fibonacci sequence arrayed around the semicircular facade of the church; 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34... They stopped when they ran out of columns or when Fibonnaci died—I forget which, but I am still engaging in my own internal "extended discourse" about that one. Stay tuned.) Also, Fabro has put together a sound track that will be heard around the square for as long as the exhibit lasts, repeating 25 segments; they range from an ancient Greek chorus to an Ambrosian chant to the classical music of Cimarosa and Pergolesi to, ultimately, a recording of Marconi's first radio message. 5. Dec. 2008
—For
some reason, there will be no exposition of installation
art at Piazza Plebiscito this year. I've just been down
there and it is bone-bare, unless, of course, Christo has
managed to install a gigantic sculpture of thin air of
emptiness hanging over the entire square, called Thin Air of Emptiness.
On the other chisel, the on-going shoring-and-sprucing up
of the Galleria Umberto may be
viewed as installation art, of sorts. I call it Shoring-and-Sprucing Up of
the Galleria Umberto (photo, right). Alas, this
means that there will be no large Christmas
Wishing Tree this year on the premises. Come back in
Twenty-oh-Nine.6. entry Jan 2009
Installation Art 2008/9 I spoke too
soon when I said there would be no installation art at Piazza del Plebiscito
this winter. They put it up a bit later than they normally
do, and I didn't check back. This year's artist is Jan Fabre (b. 1958 in
Antwerp, Belgium). He is described as "multidisciplinary";
he is a playwright, stage director, choreographer and
stage designer. He also founded the Troubleyn theater
company in Antwerp in 1986. Fabre has recently exhibited
at the Louvre in Paris. His exhibit at Piazza del Plebiscito
consists of five bronze sculptures, some of which have
previously been shown individually in public spaces
elsewhere. Thus, while the positions of the "parts" in the
square no doubt mean something, the "whole" is not
technically "site-specific" (that is, not made
specifically and only for this square in Naples, say, in
the sense of Rebecca Horn's Skulls a few years ago—#2, above). The
five sculptures are: The
man who measures the clouds (1998); The man who gives fire
(or...with a light)
(1999); The man who
cries and laughs (2005);The astronaut who directs the sea
(2006); and The man who
writes on water (2006). The pieces
are all of brilliantly polished bronze and are life-sized;
they are set around the large semicircular piazza in front of
the church of San Francesco di Paola (background, photo on
right); ...cries and
laughs (photo, above) and ...writes on water
(photo, right) are in the main portion of the square; ...gives fire (below,
left) is off to the side; ...measures the clouds (not shown) is
actually atop the far-left half of the colonnade of the
church; and ...astronaut
who directs the sea (not shown) is not in the
square at all, but on a balcony of the Royal Palace, which
faces the square. Currently (as you can see in these
photos), the entire display is cluttered by scaffolding
and bleachers being set up for the New Year's Eve
celebration. I say
"clutter," but maybe it's part of the display. You never
know with installation art. In the pompous vocabulary of
art critics (cue professorial throat-clearing...ahem...), such
displays are meant to interact with the viewing public and
invite comments, comments that then become part of the
"extended discourse" of the work, itself. In the case of
Fabre's display, the morning after it went up, there was a
single car parked directly next to the centerpiece, The man who cries and laughs
(top photo); it is in the center of the square and shows a
man atop a pedestal, facing the royal palace. His facial
expression, as the name implies, shows laughter and crying
at the same time. You are invited to interpret that as you
wish. (That is, he is holding a book in his left hand, so
maybe he's a student or, even worse, a scholar. He is
staring at the grand Royal Palace and smiling at the
centuries of culture therein contained; he is also crying
because Naples is in such a mess. That sort of thing. That
is only my own "extended discourse." Feel free to extend
your own. Maybe we can throw a few punches.) The lone car
in the morning hours was interpreted by passers-by in
various ways: (1) It's part of the work; (2) It's the
world's cleverest example of illegally parking a car,
since the owner knows that people will think the vehicle
is part of the work and leave it alone.(Conversation between two traffic cops in the square): -"What in the...?! He can't leave that car there!" -"Luigi, maybe it's part of the sculpture. If we ticket or tow it, we look like idiots." -"Do I look like an art critic to you? Call someone." A few hours later, the car was gone. That doesn't necessarily mean that it was not part of the sculpture. Maybe it was a piece of mobile extended discourse. The exhibition runs through Jan 18, but these displays sometimes run past the announced closing date. There was no printed explanatory material for this year. Here extendeth the discourse. 7. Dec 20,
2009
This
year’s installment of “installation art” at Piazza Plebiscito was
supposed to open yesterday, but there was an unspecified
technical hitch; thus, we’ll have to wait a few days to
see “Pioneer II.” It is an example of what is called
“sound art” or “Cymatics”—the visualization of sound; that
is, seeing the patterns caused, say, in sand or in a
liquid, by sound vibrations. This physical link between
the heard and the seen has interested a number of artists.
You can test the effect by covering your Stradivarius with
flour and starting to play. You see pretty pattens in the
flour as it is “excited” by the sound—just as you are excited by
the sudden drop in the value of your fiddle. This year’s
artist is Carsten
Nicolai (b. 1965, Karl-Marx-Stadt, Germany). He
has installed three large balloons moored with metal
cylinders in the square (photo, right). The balloons are
equipped with internal light sources and are
electronically linked to motion detectors on Mount
Vesuvius. Rumbles at the volcano are translated into
audible pitch and run through loud speakers set up in the
square. The effect of that sound causes something to
happen to the balloons, but I don't know what. The purpose
of it all is to show how intimately the city is linked to
the volcano. So, if the metaphorical "balloon" at Vesuvius
really does "go up" next week, I think the physical artsy
balloons, too, will really go up like crazy and explode.
So far, the cylinders are all you see. The exhibit will be
in place through Jan 12. Art is hell.8. Dec 27, 2009
Art is hell redux. The installation art at Piazza
Plebiscito (above) didn't get
off the ground. The art has been "uninstalled"—that is,
the balloons have been removed from their cylinders. The
display was too fragile, the windy weather wasn't helping,
and, apparently, one of the components had already been
damaged by a pre-New Year's firecracker. The museum that
contracted for the display, MADRE Museum (an acronym for Museo d'Arte Donna
Regina), spent €500,000 on it and now says that the
artist, Carsten Nicolai, has some reserve art warming up
on the sidelines. It will probably be called "Clouds of
Light" and will probably reuse the same cylinders that
contained the balloons. It should be in place by tonight.
Ho-hum.
The suspense is killing me.Dec 29 OK, art is only heck.
Except for the ongoing stink about how much money was
spent on this fiasco, the crisis has been overcome by the
installation of three "volcanoes of light" in place of the
three large balloons. The physical set-up is almost
identical; that is, there are now three large cylinders
representing Vesuvius (and his two twin brothers?) in the
square. At night you can enjoy the light display over the
rims of the "volcanoes." The display is accompanied by
volcano-ey rumbles of sound effects. At night, that is.
Interesting point: this particular work of installation
art is "site specific" (that is, the theme is bound to a
particular place—in this case, our local volcano). That is
not uncommon for installation art (Rebecca Horn's 2002
display in Naples was another example—#2, above). But this one is also
time-of-day specific; you can only see it at night. If you
know nothing of the display and walk across Piazza
Plebiscito on a bright sunny day and see only the
cylinders, you will no doubt work out some plausible
interpretation of what it all means. This, of course, will
have nothing to do with volcanoes. Not to fret—in the
parlance of modern art criticism, your interpretation then
becomes part of the "extended discourse" on, of, around
and about the work. Feel better?9.
Dec. 2010
This
year's
"installation
art"
is
significantly
different
than
most
of the displays since they were first
started over a decade ago in Naples. For the
first time, the display will not be set up
in Piazza Plebiscito. This is (1) bad in
that not as many people will see it but (2)
good in that there is much less chance of
damage, accidental or otherwise, to the
installation from Christmas and New Year's
revelers. Also, the display will be "site
specific" (much like Rebecca Horn's "skulls"
exhibit—#2,
above)from some
years ago). This year, the venue will be the
Piazza dei
Martire, the monument column
in that square includes four statues of
lions at the base. The display could be set
up nowhere else since it consists of six
life-sized fiber-glass replicas of one of
the originals, the "prowling" lion by Tommaso Solari.
The replicas have just stepped off their
monument pedestal, symbolizing, according to
the artist, a "reawakening" of the city. The
installation is the work of Neapolitan
artist,
Nadia Magnacca
(b.1958). She has a degree in biological sciences and
has studied and taught photography; since the early
1990s she has exhibted photography and audio-visual
displays throughout Europe. That she is a local
artist—while not unique—is the exception rather than the
rule for these exhibits of installation art in Naples.
Maybe that's a good sign, too.As it turns out, there is nothing new under the sun. In 1972, a group of local artists calling themselves the "non-existent gallery" installed a plaster lion in the same square near the memorial column. No one seemed to mind, so they graduated to trying to unload a whole parade of similar critters along the seafront leading from the Castel dell'Ovo to Piazza dei Martiri (more than a half-mile!). This time, the local gendarmes were not amused. The artists did get permission, however, to put a few in the square, itself. The display was called Hic sunt leones—"Here there be lions." And here they are again. |