|
Maria d'Enghien
(1367-1446) (photo
by Nicola Calembo)
With the
passing of the original Norman
dynasty that had ruled Sicily and southern Italy,
and then the passing away of their
successors, the Hohenstaufens (most prominent of
whom was Frederick II),
the entire territory in theory passed to the Angevin
dynasty when they took over the kingdom in 1266.
They moved the capital to the city of Naples, where
by the early 1300s they finished the Castel
Nuovo (Maschio Angioino)
and then the Sant' Elmo fortress
as symbols of their power. Yet the conquest was not
solid at all; the new rulers of the south promptly
lost the vast island of Sicily to the Aragonese after
a revolt known as the Sicilian
Vespers. (That division of the south into Sicily
and mainland gave rise to the familiar expression, “Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.”)
Furthermore,
on the mainland there was a
constant and complicated power struggle between the
two Angevin dynastic lines: the Angevins (from
Anjou, a place-name in the Provence) and those of
Durazzo (an Albanina place-name). The whole 200
years of Angevin rule in southern Italy—with the
exception of a brief, enlightened period in the
early 1300s under Robert “The Wise”—was a mess
fraught with intrigue, civil war, and plays for
power by contending parties. Part of that struggle
involved the marriage in 1384 of the above-mentioned
light of my life and countess of Lecce, Maria
d’Enghien, to Raimondo
Orsini Del Balzo (called “Raimondello”),
Prince of Taranto, one of the wealthiest feudal
lords of his times. The consolidated territories of
both parties took up about half the entire Angevin
Kingdom of Naples. Neither husband nor wife were
bound to the Angevins or Durazzos and, thus, their
holdings amounted to a large feudal state within the
kingdom. There followed about 20 years
of, by most accounts, tranquility and benevolent rule in
this principality within the
larger kingdom of Naples. Raimondello then
made the mistake of allying himself with the
Angevins, who were plotting to regain the power they
had lost some years earlier to Charles III of
Durazzo. This provoked Charles' son and successor,
Ladislas of Durazzo (1276-1314), the ruler of the kingdom, into
invading the principality in 1405. A year later,
Raimondello was killed, leaving his wife, Maria,
solely in charge of a besieged territory and holed
up in the city of Taranto. Her forces withstood the
siege and she gained the romantic reputation
throughout Italy of the lone queen valiantly holding
out against a powerful enemy. (Indeed, Ladislas was
ambitious; he appropriated papal lands for his own
use, invaded the city of Florence and even lay claim
to the throne of Hungary.) After a year of failing
to take Taranto, Ladislas went to plan B: he
proposed marriage. That worked and Maria d’Enghien
thus became the queen of Naples in 1407.
Ladislas is thought to have been poisoned in 1414. He had no heirs, so at his death the throne passed to his sister, Joan II. (She is the exception to what I said about being in love with powerful women in southern Italy; compared to Joan II, Lady MacBeth was Goldilocks.) Joan imprisoned Maria; she was freed only through the intervention of Joan's husband, James II, Count of La Marche. Maria even had her lands restored to her, and she returned to them, where she lived until 1446. Sources say that during her first “round” of rule with Raimondello as well as her short period as queen of Naples and the remainder of her life back in Lecce, she was widely admired, even beloved. She was also responsible for a remarkable piece of legislation in her principality: a legal code called the Statuta et capitula florentissimae civitatis Litii [modern Italian: Lecce], a code of jurisprudence that regulated commerce among citizens and watched over public safety and morality. No taint of treachery or 15th-century skulduggery has ever attached to her name. I wish I were 600 years younger. to main index to portal for history |